Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4720
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jing A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. CUI Xiling, Celineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-22T04:05:28Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-22T04:05:28Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 2017. Vol. 21(2), article no. 1750019.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1363-9196-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4720-
dc.description.abstractThere has been a lack of empirical research on how firms integrate different types of network benefits to facilitate innovation ambidexterity. This study examines how different types of network ties (business and political) influence innovation ambidexterity. Using a sample of 264 Chinese industrial firms, we find that business ties are significantly associated with innovation ambidexterity. The results also show that although the direct effect of political ties on innovation ambidexterity is insignificant, political ties interact significantly with business ties to foster innovation ambidexterity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWorld Scientificen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Innovation Managementen_US
dc.titleIn search for the effects of business and political ties on innovation ambidexterityen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S1363919617500190-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Business Administration-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Business Administration - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

24
checked on Dec 8, 2024

Page view(s)

105
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.