Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4238
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dr. LAM Che Fai, Lubanski | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-18T02:57:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-18T02:57:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Shue Yan Academic Journal, Jan 2005, no. 3, pp. 270-283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9628719467 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4238 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Snell's research on Hong Kong companies' response to ethical challenges found that, when staff were requested by a boss or superior authority to do something regarded as ethically wrong, they expressed feelings of contractual or interpersonally based obligation to obey. The paper reports on a study of Hong Kong executives using the Critical Incident Technique to understand their perceptions and subsequent decisions when they encounter an ethical issue. Thomas's conceptual framework of conflict management styles is used to classify their responses to the request of a boss or superior authority to do something regarded as ethically wrong. The study found that while competitive, accommodative, sharing and avoidant conflict management styles were all utilized, the collaborative style was absent... | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | 香港: 香港樹仁學院 | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | 樹仁學報 = Shue Yan Academic Journal | en_US |
dc.title | Conflict management styles: Responses to ethical dilemmas by Hong Kong business executives | en_US |
dc.type | Peer Reviewed Journal Article | en_US |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Business Administration | - |
Appears in Collections: | Business Administration - Publication |
Page view(s)
260
Last Week
2
2
Last month
checked on Nov 24, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Impact Indices
PlumX
Metrics
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.