Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8983
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. XIAO Huina, Nancyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T08:23:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-30T08:23:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationColumbia Journal of Asian Law, 2018, Vol. 31(2), pp. 218-262.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1094-8449-
dc.identifier.issn2373-0498-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8983-
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the decision-making process of the frontline tax bureaus in China. It suggests that the pressures of the revenue target, political and social networks, and a flawed tax legal system have shaped the frontline tax bureaucrats’ calculations on costs and benefits. Drawing on the cost-benefit analysis, this study finds four types of decisions in these situations: symbolic enforcement, creative enforcement, weak enforcement, and negotiated enforcement. The study suggests that to discipline frontline tax officials is never easy since most are constrained in a vicious circle. Only when the institutional environment is changed can the outcome of law enforcement be substantially enhanced. The typology is shown to be more applicable and comprehensive to understand the problems of law enforcement in developed and developing countries.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Columbia Journal of Asian Law=中國法研究學刊en_US
dc.titleWhy law enforcement is weak in China? the mindset of the frontline tax officialsen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.7916/cjal.v31i2.3368-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Law and Business-
Appears in Collections:Law and Business - Publication
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.