Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8983
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dr. XIAO Huina, Nancy | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-30T08:23:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-30T08:23:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 2018, Vol. 31(2), pp. 218-262. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1094-8449 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2373-0498 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8983 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines the decision-making process of the frontline tax bureaus in China. It suggests that the pressures of the revenue target, political and social networks, and a flawed tax legal system have shaped the frontline tax bureaucrats’ calculations on costs and benefits. Drawing on the cost-benefit analysis, this study finds four types of decisions in these situations: symbolic enforcement, creative enforcement, weak enforcement, and negotiated enforcement. The study suggests that to discipline frontline tax officials is never easy since most are constrained in a vicious circle. Only when the institutional environment is changed can the outcome of law enforcement be substantially enhanced. The typology is shown to be more applicable and comprehensive to understand the problems of law enforcement in developed and developing countries. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Columbia Journal of Asian Law=中國法研究學刊 | en_US |
dc.title | Why law enforcement is weak in China? the mindset of the frontline tax officials | en_US |
dc.type | Peer Reviewed Journal Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.7916/cjal.v31i2.3368 | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Law and Business | - |
Appears in Collections: | Law and Business - Publication |
Page view(s)
55
Last Week
0
0
Last month
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Impact Indices
Altmetric
PlumX
Metrics
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.