Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8982
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHe, Xinen_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. XIAO Huina, Nancyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-30T08:15:16Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-30T08:15:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationLaw & Policy, 2009, Vol. 41(2), pp. 242-266.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9930-
dc.identifier.issn0265-8240-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8982-
dc.description.abstractDrawing on fieldwork investigations of shoe manufacturers in southeastern China, this article provides empirical evidence for understanding these businesses’ taxpaying practices. We find that since business taxpayers largely regard tax law as illegitimate, instrumental considerations dominate these taxpayers’ decisions to pay or not pay taxes. We then incorporate “structural opportunities for evasion” and “perceived costs of evasion” to develop a two-by-two matrix to understand the following types of behavior: aggressive evasion, obliged compliance, strategic compliance, and reciprocal compliance. We argue that this matrix explains why value added tax fraud is widespread in China while voluntary compliance is rare. It also helps to illuminate compliance more generally in developing economies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLaw & Policyen_US
dc.titleA typology of tax compliance in developing economies: Empirical evidence from China's shoe industryen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12126-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Law and Business-
Appears in Collections:Law and Business - Publication
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.