Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8183
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Saien_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. CHU Tsz Hang, Kenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Guanxiongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-10T08:50:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-10T08:50:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationCommunication Research, 2023, Vol. 50(6), pp. 720-744.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0093-6502-
dc.identifier.issn1552-3810-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/8183-
dc.description.abstractBandwagon cues are system-aggregated information about crowd behavior or peer endorsement displayed on a web interface (e.g., the number of likes on a Facebook post). Despite the recent proliferation of research on the effect of bandwagon cues on credibility perceptions, a comprehensive meta-analytic review of this effect has not yet been performed and published. Based on 161 effect sizes from 41 studies, the current meta-analysis revealed that bandwagon cues had a positive, albeit small, effect on credibility perceptions. Moderator analyses indicated that this effect was stronger (a) when the message was related to the marketing topic, (b) when the source was a non-expert (vs. an expert), and (c) when participants were from collectivistic (vs. individualistic) cultures. However, the bandwagon effect did not vary by cue feature (e.g., deliberateness). These findings are discussed in light of theoretical implications, practical guidelines, and directions for future research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCommunication Researchen_US
dc.titleDo bandwagon cues affect credibility perceptions? a meta-analysis of the experimental evidenceen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221124395-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Journalism & Communication-
Appears in Collections:Journalism & Communication - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

43
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.