Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/7875
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. LAU Kung Wongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-25T06:43:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-25T06:43:15Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Design Research, 2011, 9(3), 203-219.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-3050-
dc.identifier.issn1569-1551-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/7875-
dc.description.abstractDesign education bodies have been calling for new assessment approaches in higher education. However, there has been little research hitherto conducted in assessing designers' creative thinking skills as well as their performances. It is difficult to develop a generic assessment tool to assess design students' problem-solving skills, creative outcomes and end products due to the diverse design domains, content specifics and the subjectivity of aesthetic judgment. This paper aims to further the discussions on seeking appropriate assessment tools for assessing designers' creativity form. Although this paper is not able to suggest a perfect assessment tool for higher design education, advantages of using criterion-referenced assessment (CRA) have been explored to facilitate design students' creativity development.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInderscience Enterprises Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Design Researchen_US
dc.titleThe difficulties of assessing design students’ creativity: A critical review on various approaches for design educationen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Journalism & Communication-
Appears in Collections:Journalism & Communication - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

11
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.