Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/7158
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDerbie, Abioten_US
dc.contributor.authorChau, Bolton K. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, Clive H. Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Li-Dianen_US
dc.contributor.authorTing, Kin-Hungen_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. LAM Yin-Hung, Bessen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Tatia M. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Chetwyn C. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Yolanden_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-14T08:09:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-14T08:09:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1460-9568-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/7158-
dc.description.abstractThe uniqueness of neural processes between allocentric and egocentric spatial coding has been controversial. The distinctive paradigms used in previous studies for manipulating spatial coding could have attributed for the inconsistent results. This study was aimed to generate converging evidence from previous functional brain imaging experiments for collating neural substrates associated with these two types of spatial coding. An additional aim was to test whether test-taking processes would have influenced the results. We obtained coordinate-based functional neuroimaging data for 447 subjects and performed activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. Among the 28 experiments, the results indicate two common clusters of convergence. They were the right precuneus and the right superior frontal gyrus as parts of the parieto-frontal circuit. Between-type differences were in the parieto-occipital circuit, with allocentric showing convergence in the superior occipital gyrus (SOG) cluster compared with egocentric showing convergence in the middle occipital gyrus (MOG) cluster. Task-specific influences were only found in allocentric spatial coding. Spatial judgment-oriented tasks seem to increase the demands on manipulating spatial relationships among the visual objects, while spatial navigation tasks seem to increase the demands on maintaining object representations. Our findings address the theoretical controversies on spatial coding that both the allocentric and egocentric types are common in their processes mediated by the parieto-frontal network, while unique and additional processes in the allocentric type are mediated by the parieto-occipital network. The positive results on possible task-specific confound offer insights into the future design of spatial tasks for eliciting spatial coding processes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Neuroscienceen_US
dc.titleCommon and distinct neural trends of allocentric and egocentric spatial coding: an ALE meta-analysisen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ejn.15240-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Counselling & Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Page view(s)

41
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.