Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6940
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. ZHAN Fangqiongen_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Chaofenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-18T09:38:00Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-18T09:38:00Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationLanguage and Linguistics, 2013, vol. 14(4), pp. 755-789.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1606-822X-
dc.identifier.issn2309-5067-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6940-
dc.description.abstractThis paper, based on a cross-linguistic understanding of the concepts of "copula" and "cleft", demonstrates that the Standard Modern Chinese shì is an invariant non-inflectional verb typically co-occurring with NPs whereby they together form the predicate of a copular sentence. According to Construction Grammar (theorized by Goldberg 1995, 2006. Croft 2001, 2005, etc.), a copular construction can be understood as a form and meaning pair that entails a proposition with the nominal semantics of specificational and predicational (Blom & Daalder 1977, Declerck 1988. Patten 2010, Zhan 2012). Furthermore, a constructional schematic taxonomy is proposed for the prototypical Chinese copular construction, under which the cleft construction is a subschema of the specificational copular construction. The Chinese cleft [NP COP NOM] denotes the specificational meaning (the NP and the nominalization representing a referential member and a non- referential but restricted set forming a member-class relationship) plus a contrastive focus. Finally, the cleft construction is treated to have two subschemas: cleft-sbj and cleft-obj. In a cleft-sbj sentence, the sentential subject is co-referential with the subject in the embedded nominalization, and the presence of the nominalizer de is optional. In a cleft-obj sentence, the sentential subject is co-referential with the object in the nominalization, and the presence of the nominalizer is obligatory. It will be shown that the treatment of shì as an adverb in the cleft-sbj sentence (Teng 1979, Huang 1998, etc.) falls short in explaining why shì can co-occur with an optional de. With a copula treatment of shì, the presence of de as a nominalizer logically follows from a specificational [NP COP NOM] analysis. Therefore, the Chinese cleft construction basically functions to signal, instead of a transitory process that an adverbial hypothesis implies, a non-transitory state or situation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofLanguage and Linguistics = 語言暨語言學en_US
dc.titleA copula analysis of shi in the Chinese cleft constructionen_US
dc.title.alternative漢語分裂構式中的系詞研究en_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chinese Language & Literature-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Chinese Language & Literature - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

112
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.