Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6940
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dr. ZHAN Fangqiong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Chaofen | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-18T09:38:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-18T09:38:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Language and Linguistics, 2013, vol. 14(4), pp. 755-789. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1606-822X | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2309-5067 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6940 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper, based on a cross-linguistic understanding of the concepts of "copula" and "cleft", demonstrates that the Standard Modern Chinese shì is an invariant non-inflectional verb typically co-occurring with NPs whereby they together form the predicate of a copular sentence. According to Construction Grammar (theorized by Goldberg 1995, 2006. Croft 2001, 2005, etc.), a copular construction can be understood as a form and meaning pair that entails a proposition with the nominal semantics of specificational and predicational (Blom & Daalder 1977, Declerck 1988. Patten 2010, Zhan 2012). Furthermore, a constructional schematic taxonomy is proposed for the prototypical Chinese copular construction, under which the cleft construction is a subschema of the specificational copular construction. The Chinese cleft [NP COP NOM] denotes the specificational meaning (the NP and the nominalization representing a referential member and a non- referential but restricted set forming a member-class relationship) plus a contrastive focus. Finally, the cleft construction is treated to have two subschemas: cleft-sbj and cleft-obj. In a cleft-sbj sentence, the sentential subject is co-referential with the subject in the embedded nominalization, and the presence of the nominalizer de is optional. In a cleft-obj sentence, the sentential subject is co-referential with the object in the nominalization, and the presence of the nominalizer is obligatory. It will be shown that the treatment of shì as an adverb in the cleft-sbj sentence (Teng 1979, Huang 1998, etc.) falls short in explaining why shì can co-occur with an optional de. With a copula treatment of shì, the presence of de as a nominalizer logically follows from a specificational [NP COP NOM] analysis. Therefore, the Chinese cleft construction basically functions to signal, instead of a transitory process that an adverbial hypothesis implies, a non-transitory state or situation. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Language and Linguistics = 語言暨語言學 | en_US |
dc.title | A copula analysis of shi in the Chinese cleft construction | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | 漢語分裂構式中的系詞研究 | en_US |
dc.type | Peer Reviewed Journal Article | en_US |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Chinese Language & Literature | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | Chinese Language & Literature - Publication |
Page view(s)
112
Last Week
0
0
Last month
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Impact Indices
PlumX
Metrics
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.