Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6934
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Sien_US
dc.contributor.authorHe, Yunjuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWayland, Ratreeen_US
dc.contributor.authorYANG Yikeen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Beien_US
dc.contributor.authorYuen, Chun Wahen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T07:17:45Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-14T07:17:45Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationSpeech Communication, Dec. 2019, vol. 115, pp. 67-77.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-6393-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6934-
dc.description.abstractThis study is the first comprehensive acoustic study to examine the acquisition of two Mandarin tone sandhi rules: the third tone sandhi and the more phonetically motivated, half-third sandhi rule by both tonal (Cantonese) and non-tonal (American English) speakers using a Wug Test. Participants were asked to form disyllables from two monosyllabic morphemes. To test for the operation of the lexical versus the computation mechanisms in sandhi rule application, both real and various types of wug (nonsense) morphemes were included. Functional data analysis revealed that Cantonese and American speakers apply the two rules similarly on both real words and wug words, suggesting that the sandhi forms are stored as part of the representation of the abstract Tone 3 (T3) category, and computation of allophonic variants is likely to be involved during production. However, in their computation of tone sandhi rules, L2 learners showed less detailed and less accurate production of tonal contours compared to native speakers, due, perhaps, to less detailed phonological representations of allophonic variants. In general, Cantonese speakers performed better than American speakers. Perceptual mapping between Mandarin sandhi T3 to existing Cantonese tone categories may be responsible for the observed pitch contours among Cantonese speakers. Finally, no phonetic bias was found in the application of the two sandhi rules among these groups of L2 learners, which is likely due to more variability in L2’s speech, obscuring any differences that may exist.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSpeech Communicationen_US
dc.titleMechanisms of tone sandhi rule application by tonal non-tonal non-native speakersen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.specom.2019.10.008-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Chinese Language and Literature-
Appears in Collections:Chinese Language & Literature - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Dec 15, 2024

Page view(s)

82
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Dec 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.