Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6327
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. LAU Hi Po, Boboen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuk, James KHen_US
dc.contributor.authorFong, Candy HCen_US
dc.contributor.authorChow, Amy YMen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cecilia L. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, Wing Chunen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Wai Kwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Felix HWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T11:04:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-19T11:04:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Dec. 2019, vol. 14(2), pp. 81-88.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1819-1576-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6327-
dc.description.abstractBackground. Advance care planning (ACP) is considered to be an integral part of end-of-life care. This study explored the facilitators and barriers of ACP by consolidating the practice experiences of a group of healthcare professionals involved in an outreach end-of-life programme for older people living residential care homes for the elderly (RCHEs). Methods: Fourteen healthcare professionals participated in this qualitative study. They first completed a questionnaire to capture their views on ACP by describing a successful case. Then they took part in a focus group to discuss desired outcomes, facilitators, and barriers of ACP. Thematic analysis was applied to the questionnaire and focus group data. Results: Participants considered ACP a valuable opportunity for older people to express their care preferences. The resultant care plan provides families and care teams a useful reference for treatment decision-making. Facilitators included the collaborative ties among the community geriatric assessment team, RCHE staff, and the families of patients; dedicated and trained staff; and well-informed family members. Barriers included delayed referral, a lack of public acceptance and awareness, and overwhelming routines among healthcare professionals. Conclusions: Our findings underscore the multitude of individual, family, staff, and social factors affecting the dynamic process of ACP. An effective collaborative framework and professional training in communicating with distressed families are required. In addition, enhancing public awareness of comfort care and ACP is crucial.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Journal of Gerontology & Geriatricsen_US
dc.titleFacilitators and barriers to advance care planning programmes targeting older care home residents: A qualitative studyen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.12809/ajgg-2018-326-oa-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Counselling & Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Page view(s)

64
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.