Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6008
Title: | How do Chinese college students define sexual harassment? |
Authors: | Prof. TANG So Kum, Catherine Yik, Michelle S. M. Cheung, Fanny Mui-ching Choi, Po-king Au, Kit-chun |
Issue Date: | 1995 |
Source: | Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1995, vol. 10(4), pp. 503-515. |
Journal: | Journal of Interpersonal Violence |
Abstract: | This study aimed to delineate the definitions of sexual harassment and their relation with various subject characteristics. Results showed that Chinese students demonstrated a high level of consensus in regarding overt unwelcome physical contact and coercive sexuality as sexual harassment. Only a small percentage of the students classified sexist and misogynistic behaviors, pressure for dates, and unsolicited disclosure of personal and emotional feelings as sexually harassing. Factor analyses indicated that faculty-student sexual harassment was composed of three factors: sexual coercion, physical seduction, and gender harassment. Peer sexual harassment, on the other hand, included four factors: sexual coercion, physical seduction, nonphysical seduction, and gender harassment. Individuals' intolerance toward sexual harassment was related to their support for gender equality and flexible gender roles. Compared to men, women had broader definitions of sexual harassment and were less tolerant of these behaviors. |
Type: | Peer Reviewed Journal Article |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6008 |
ISSN: | 0886-2605 1552-6518 |
DOI: | 10.1177/088626095010004008 |
Appears in Collections: | Counselling and Psychology - Publication |
Find@HKSYU Show full item record
SCOPUSTM
Citations
30
checked on Dec 15, 2024
Page view(s)
41
Last Week
0
0
Last month
checked on Dec 20, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Impact Indices
Altmetric
PlumX
Metrics
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.