Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6008
Title: How do Chinese college students define sexual harassment?
Authors: Prof. TANG So Kum, Catherine 
Yik, Michelle S. M. 
Cheung, Fanny Mui-ching 
Choi, Po-king 
Au, Kit-chun 
Issue Date: 1995
Source: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1995, vol. 10(4), pp. 503-515.
Journal: Journal of Interpersonal Violence 
Abstract: This study aimed to delineate the definitions of sexual harassment and their relation with various subject characteristics. Results showed that Chinese students demonstrated a high level of consensus in regarding overt unwelcome physical contact and coercive sexuality as sexual harassment. Only a small percentage of the students classified sexist and misogynistic behaviors, pressure for dates, and unsolicited disclosure of personal and emotional feelings as sexually harassing. Factor analyses indicated that faculty-student sexual harassment was composed of three factors: sexual coercion, physical seduction, and gender harassment. Peer sexual harassment, on the other hand, included four factors: sexual coercion, physical seduction, nonphysical seduction, and gender harassment. Individuals' intolerance toward sexual harassment was related to their support for gender equality and flexible gender roles. Compared to men, women had broader definitions of sexual harassment and were less tolerant of these behaviors.
Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6008
ISSN: 0886-2605
1552-6518
DOI: 10.1177/088626095010004008
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Nov 3, 2024

Page view(s)

38
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Nov 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.