Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6005
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPorter, James F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCritelli, Joseph W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorProf. TANG So Kum, Catherineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T08:05:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T08:05:04Z-
dc.date.issued1992-
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Sexual Behavior, 1992, vol. 21(5), pp. 457-468.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-0002-
dc.identifier.issn1573-2800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/6005-
dc.description.abstractThe relative contributions to sexual aggression of general sexual and aggressive motives and their respective inhibitory factors were compared. One hundred forty-three university males responded to self-report measures of sexual and aggressive drives, sex and hostility guilt, social desirability response bias, and history of coercive sexuality. With the effects of social desirability controlled, the only predictor of sexual aggression was Sex Guilt, which predicted level of force used but not intimacy of the sexual act obtained.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Sexual Behavioren_US
dc.titleSexual and aggressive motives in sexually aggressive college malesen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/BF01542270-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversity Management-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

61
Last Week
2
Last month
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.