Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/5936
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFu, Sau-Ngaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDao, Man Chien_US
dc.contributor.authorLuk, Wanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLam, Margaret Choi Hingen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Irene Sau Fanen_US
dc.contributor.authorProf. CHEUNG Siu-Keungen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, Carlos King Hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Bernard Man Yungen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-10T02:49:03Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-10T02:49:03Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 2020, vol. 22(9), pp. 1565-1576.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7176-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jch.13987-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/5936-
dc.descriptionOpen Accessen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Risk Assessment and Management Program (RAMP) has successfully demonstrated a reduction of blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular (CVD) risk of patients with hypertension. This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control rate of participants after attended RAMP group, with those attended RAMP individual from usual care. A prospective open cluster‐randomized controlled trial was performed in five public primary care clinics. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were recruited. RAMP group consisted of multi‐disciplinary group education on knowledge of hypertension, lifestyle modification, and hands‐on home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) training. Each participant was given a branchial HBPM device. An individual face‐to‐face nurse follow‐up was arranged 6 weeks later. Participants' office BP and clinical parameters were assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months. Three RAMP group and two RAMP‐individual clusters recruited 152 and 139 participants, respectively. The mean age was 67.0 (SD 9.9) year. After 18 months of treatment, there was a significantly higher BP control rate in the RAMP‐group participants than the RAMP‐individual participants (78.9% vs 36.5%, P < .001). The systolic BP was reduced by 19.7 mm Hg (95% CI −22.03, −17.40, P < .001) and diastolic BP by 8.1 mm Hg (95% CI −9.66, −6.61, P < .001) in RAMP group while the RAMP individual demonstrated 9.3 mm Hg (95% CI −12.1, −6.4, P < .001) reduction in systolic BP without any significant difference in diastolic BP. The RAMP‐group participants' body weight (BW) and body mass index(BMI) had no significant changes, while the RAMP‐individual participants had a significant increase in BW and BMI. No adverse effect was reported.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Clinical Hypertensionen_US
dc.titleA cluster-randomized study on the risk assessment and management program for home blood pressure monitoring in an older population with inadequate health literacyen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jch.13987-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversity Management-
Appears in Collections:Sociology - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 3, 2024

Page view(s)

144
Last Week
2
Last month
checked on Nov 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.