Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4941
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. ZHOU Dehui, Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorHeineken, Edgaren_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-31T08:30:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-31T08:30:23Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes (Iberica), 2009, v. 18, pp. 23-42.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1139-7241-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.aelfe.org/documents/03_18_Zhou.pdf-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4941-
dc.description.abstractThe rationalists and the empiricists in the 17th century once argued that metaphor is an inferior device to convey objective truth and should be replaced by literal statements. On the one hand, this article shares Lakoff and Johnson's (1980 & 1999) view that metaphor is useful to pursue experiential truth and explains why "metaphors are necessary and not just nice" (Ortony, 1975:45). On the other hand, it reports a cognitive psychological experiment, which shows that metaphor comprehension can be greatly influenced by people's pre-existing conceptual knowledge and the context, in which the metaphor appears. The authors advocate a conscious use of metaphors in academic communication with full awareness of the factors that may influence metaphor comprehension.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes (Iberica)en_US
dc.titleThe use of metaphors in academic communication: Traps or treasuresen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Counselling & Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

97
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.