Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4848
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. LEE Huaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Yi-Hsingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chen-Chinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-30T12:27:10Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-30T12:27:10Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www2.aaahq.org/AM2015/abstract.cfm?submissionID=1909-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4848-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines whether reputable auditors affect the probability of informed trade (PIN). Using a sample of firms in an emerging market, we posit and find evidence that the PIN is lower for clients whose audit partners (audit firms) are industry specialists than for clients whose audit partners (audit firms) are not industry specialists. Additional results show that the partner’s specialization is negatively related to the magnitude of discretionary accruals, which in turn is positively associated with the level of PIN. Overall, the evidence suggests that the reputable auditors' industry specialization provides an effective mechanism through which information asymmetry is reduced. The analyses provide related policy implications.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleDo reputable auditors matter for informed trading?en_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dc.relation.conferenceAmerican Accounting Association Annual Meeting 2015en_US
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Accounting-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Accounting-
Appears in Collections:Accounting - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

150
Last Week
1
Last month
checked on Apr 3, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.