Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4848
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dr. LEE Hua | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liao, Yi-Hsing | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Chen-Chin | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-30T12:27:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-30T12:27:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www2.aaahq.org/AM2015/abstract.cfm?submissionID=1909 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4848 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines whether reputable auditors affect the probability of informed trade (PIN). Using a sample of firms in an emerging market, we posit and find evidence that the PIN is lower for clients whose audit partners (audit firms) are industry specialists than for clients whose audit partners (audit firms) are not industry specialists. Additional results show that the partner’s specialization is negatively related to the magnitude of discretionary accruals, which in turn is positively associated with the level of PIN. Overall, the evidence suggests that the reputable auditors' industry specialization provides an effective mechanism through which information asymmetry is reduced. The analyses provide related policy implications. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Do reputable auditors matter for informed trading? | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.relation.conference | American Accounting Association Annual Meeting 2015 | en_US |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Accounting | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Accounting | - |
Appears in Collections: | Accounting - Publication |
Page view(s)
150
Last Week
1
1
Last month
checked on Apr 3, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Impact Indices
PlumX
Metrics
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.