Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4483
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorProf. CHEN Tien Yiu, Theodoreen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Feida Franken_US
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Gaoguang Stephenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T05:25:08Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-28T05:25:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of International Financial Management & Accounting, Oct. 2017, vol. 28(3), pp. 274-307.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0954-1314-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4483-
dc.description.abstractWe examine whether and how auditors respond to audit risks arising from secrecy culture when making audit opinion decisions. Using a sample of international Big N auditors from 33 countries, we find strong and robust evidence that auditors are more likely to issue modified audit opinions to clients domiciled in countries with a strong secrecy culture. In addition, we find that the association between secrecy culture and auditors' propensity to issue modified audit opinions is less pronounced in countries with strong investor protection than that in countries with weak investor protection.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of International Financial Management & Accountingen_US
dc.titleSecrecy culture and audit opinion: Some international evidenceen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jifm.12057-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Accounting - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Page view(s)

84
Last Week
1
Last month
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.