Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4473
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorProf. CHAN Ching, Selinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-22T03:28:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-22T03:28:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationThe China Quarterly, Jun 2011, vol. 206, pp. 372-390.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-7410-
dc.identifier.issn1468-2648-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4473-
dc.description.abstractThis article compares cultural governance in Taiwan and China through their respective place-making processes. It investigates how cultural polices objectify tradition and popularize cultural landscape in local places for economic development and identity politics. Contrary to what would be commonly expected, the Chinese government adopted a minimalist approach while the Taiwanese government was much more hands-on. The sociopolitical histories of the two governments and their objectives are examined to understand this differences. In addition, the reactions of the locals to cultural policies in the two places are also contrasted. Finally, the different effects of cultural governance in China and Taiwan are examined. In particular, it was found that communal relations have deteriorated in China but strengthened in Taiwan as a result.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCambridge: Cambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe China Quaterlyen_US
dc.titleCultural governance and place-making in Taiwan and Chinaen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0305741011000312-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptUniversity Management-
Appears in Collections:Sociology - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Nov 17, 2024

Page view(s)

219
Last Week
4
Last month
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.