Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10844
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorProf. Lau, Raymond Wing-kamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-12T02:53:31Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-12T02:53:31Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationLau, W. K. (2024). Rethinking the needham question: A non-eurocentric framework transcending dialogism. Palgrave Macmillan Singapore.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789819794713-
dc.identifier.isbn9789819794720-
dc.identifier.isbn9789819794744-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10844-
dc.descriptionThis book offers a new investigation of the Needham Question. Why did modern science emerge in Europe, but not in any of the advanced non-European civilizations? Eurocentric accounts attribute it to certain ‘qualities’ said to be ‘unique’ to Europe. Opposed to the Eurocentric view is a position known as the ‘dialogical perspective’. Dialogism argues that Europe borrowed heavily from non-European scientific knowledges, and that scientific exchanges were key to the development of modern science. Neo-Eurocentric arguments have emerged in response to the challenge of dialogism, and the debate between Eurocentrism/neo-Eurocentrism and dialogism currently stands at a stalemate. In this book, Raymond Lau brings a new theoretical-methodological framework to finally settle this debate. The historical analysis developed here shows that to secure the non-Eurocentric case, and decisively rebut Eurocentrism and neo-Eurocentrism, it is necessary to go beyond dialogism both theoretically and methodologically. 358 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillan Singaporeen_US
dc.titleRethinking the needham question: A non-eurocentric framework transcending dialogismen_US
dc.typeBooken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-981-97-9472-0-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptContemporary China Research Center-
Appears in Collections:Contemporary China Research Center - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

12
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on May 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.