Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10759
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorProf. Lau, Raymond Wing-kamen_US
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Jamieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T02:31:06Z-
dc.date.available2025-04-10T02:31:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationSociology, 2014, vol. 48(3), pp. 573-589.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0038-0385-
dc.identifier.issn1469-8684-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10759-
dc.description.abstractIn recent developments in the realism-constructionism debate, attempts have been made by individual scholars on both sides to assimilate the other side’s insights into one’s own position. With respect to epistemology, such attempts have so far failed. Situated in this context, this article proposes a general approach in which valid insights from constructionism, discourse theory, and pragmatist critique of realism are integrated into realist epistemology. Discourses are distinguished along two dimensions; interrelating these two dimensions, the interplay between epistemic and extra-discursive factors along them in discursive contention are analyzed under different categories of situations across the entire discursive spectrum. The balance between the determinative effects of epistemic and extra-discursive factors varies from one type of situation to another. Our approach enables the retention of the critical edge of skepticism, shows realist epistemology to be useful in sociological research in ways previously unrealized, and provides heuristic guidelines for conducting sociological research.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSociologyen_US
dc.titleIntegrating discourse, construction and objectivity: A contemporary realist approachen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0038038513491466-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptContemporary China Research Center-
Appears in Collections:Contemporary China Research Center - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on May 18, 2025

Page view(s)

11
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on May 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.