Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10552
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, Siumanen_US
dc.contributor.authorXie, Weiyien_US
dc.contributor.authorGao, Junlingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Manen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Hanken_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Huiyunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSik, Hun Hungen_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. LAU Hi Po, Boboen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Cecilia Lai Waien_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-29T07:19:25Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-29T07:19:25Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationStress and Health, 2024, article no. e3488.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-2998-
dc.identifier.issn1532-3005-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10552-
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing interest in identifying how posttraumatic growth (PTG) impacts emotional processing following traumatic events (e.g., the COVID-19 pandemic). Previous research suggests that high PTG levels may lead to enduring changes in positive emotional processing. Despite this fact, little is known regarding brain activation and responses to stressful emotional stimuli. The present study utilised event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether individual differences in emotional responses toward neutral and negative emotional stimuli related to COVID-19 are related to self-reported PTG levels. A total of 77 participants were analysed: 21 in the high PTG group and 56 in the control group. The amplitude of the N2 was smaller in the high PTG group compared to the control group under both negative and neutral conditions. When viewing the negative emotion pictures (vs. neutral pictures), the N2 amplitude significantly decreased for the high PTG group in the right occipital and frontal-parietal areas, whereas no significant change was observed among the control group. In the time window Late Positive Potential (LPP) 600–1000 ms, emotional stimuli and the group interaction were significant. Viewing negative pictures (vs. neutral pictures) decreased the LPP 600–1000 ms amplitudes for the control group, mainly originating from the brain's frontal regions. However, there were no such significant differences for the PTG group. Due to the limited sample size and cultural differences, the applicability of these results to other regions or countries needs to be verified. The presented findings suggest that the impact of PTG during emotional response is reflected in both bottom-up (evidenced by the early ERP components) and top-down (evidenced by the later ERP components) processes. Individuals with high PTG may use a meditation-related emotional regulation strategy of acceptance at the basic stage and non-judgement at a later stage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofStress and Healthen_US
dc.titlePosttraumatic growth modulates the response to negative emotions related to COVID-19: An event-related potentials studyen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smi.3488-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Counselling & Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
Last Week
1
Last month
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.