Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10535
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavid, Anneen_US
dc.contributor.authorYigitcanlar, Tanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDesouza, Kevinen_US
dc.contributor.authorProf. LI Yi Man, Ritaen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheong, Pauline Hopeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMehmood, Rashiden_US
dc.contributor.authorCorchado, Juanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-28T02:59:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-28T02:59:26Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationCities, 2024, vol. 155, article no. 105502.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-2751-
dc.identifier.issn1873-6084-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10535-
dc.description.abstractThe burgeoning capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) have prompted numerous local governments worldwide to consider its integration into their operations. Nevertheless, instances of notable AI failures have heightened ethical concerns, emphasising the imperative for local governments to approach the adoption of AI technologies in a responsible manner. While local government AI guidelines endeavour to incorporate characteristics of responsible innovation and technology (RIT), it remains essential to assess the extent to which these characteristics have been integrated into policy guidelines to facilitate more effective AI governance in the future. This study closely examines local government policy documents (n = 26) through the lens of RIT, employing directed content analysis with thematic data analysis software. The results reveal that: (a) Not all RIT characteristics have been given equal consideration in these policy documents; (b) Participatory and deliberate considerations were the most frequently mentioned responsible AI characteristics in policy documents; (c) Adaptable, explainable, sustainable, and accountable considerations were the least present responsible AI characteristics in policy documents; (d) Many of the considerations overlapped with each other as local governments were at the early stages of identifying them. Furthermore, the paper summarised strategies aimed at assisting local authorities in identifying their strengths and weaknesses in responsible AI characteristics, thereby facilitating their transformation into governing entities with responsible AI practices. The study informs local government policymakers, practitioners, and researchers on the critical aspects of responsible AI policymaking.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCitiesen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding local government responsible AI strategy: An international municipal policy document analysisen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cities.2024.105502-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Economics and Finance-
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
Last Week
1
Last month
checked on Jan 19, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.