Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10331
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMordeno, Imelu G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDr. NALIPAY Ma. Jenina N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorUntalan, John Hermes C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDecatoria, Johnny B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-30T10:24:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-30T10:24:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationAsian Journal of Psychiatry, 2014, vol. 11, pp. 28-34.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-2026-
dc.identifier.issn1876-2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10331-
dc.description.abstractBackground The discourse of latent structure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has been extensive in trauma literature. Although findings have been consistent in rejecting DSM-IV-TR's three-factor model, alternative models are still fervently argued. This study contributes to the discussion by examining and comparing PTSD factor structure of the three most validated models—numbing model ( King et al., 1998 ), dysphoria model ( Simms et al., 2002 ), and dysphoric arousal model ( Elhai et al., 2011b )—and determining if these are generalizable across treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking Filipinos with exposure to trauma events. Methods Filipino-Tagalog version of Harvard Trauma Questionnaire (HTQ; Mollica et al., 1992 ) was administered to a sample of 737 treatment-seeking (n = 526) and non-treatment-seeking (n = 211) Filipinos who experienced and witnessed varied trauma events. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted involving the three models in order to determine the best-fitting model and generalizability across samples. Results Results showed that all three models achieved excellent fit, with dysphoric arousal model slightly fitting better than numbing and dysphoria models in both treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking samples. Series of invariance testing, however, indicated that although dysphoric arousal model fits significantly better than dysphoria model, it did not significantly differ from numbing model. Results revealed that aside from the factor loadings, the two groups are noninvariant in all parameters. Treatment-seeking sample had larger intercepts, factor variances and covariances and factor means than non-treatment-seeking group. Discussion The findings strongly contribute to the literature by showing how the type of groupings (treatment-seeking vs. non-treatment-seeking) moderates PTSD latent structure. It affirms the suggestion of Biehn et al. (2012) to be cautious in concluding the generalizability of PTSD models in the context that type of participants moderates PTSD's factor structure.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Journal of Psychiatryen_US
dc.titleExamining posttraumatic stress disorder's latent structure between treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking Filipinosen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2014.05.003-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Counselling & Psychology-
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

15
Last Week
2
Last month
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.