Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10296
Title: A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions.
Authors: Ahmadi, Asghar 
Noetel, Michael 
Parker, Philip 
Ryan, Richard M. 
Ntoumanis, Nikos 
Reeve, Johnmarshall 
Beauchamp, Mark 
Dicke, Theresa 
Yeung, Alexander 
Ahmadi, Malek 
Bartholomew, Kimberley 
Chiu, Thomas K. F. 
Curran, Thomas 
Erturan, Gokce 
Flunger, Barbara 
Frederick, Christina 
Froiland, John Mark 
Gonzalez-Cutre, David 
Haerens, Leen 
Jeno, Lucas Matias 
Koka, Andre 
Krijgsman, Christa 
Langdon, Jody 
White, Rhiannon Lee 
Litalien, David 
Lubans, David 
Mahoney, John 
Dr. NALIPAY Ma. Jenina N. 
Patall, Erika 
Perlman, Dana 
Quested, Eleanor 
Schneider, Sascha 
Standage, Martyn 
Stroet, Kim 
Tessier, Damien 
Thogersen-Ntoumani, Cecilie 
Tilga, Henri 
Vasconcellos, Diego 
Lonsdale, Chris 
Issue Date: 2023
Source: Journal of Educational Psychology, 2023, vol. 115(8), pp. 1158-1176.
Journal: Journal of Educational Psychology 
Abstract: Teachers’ behavior is a key factor that influences students’ motivation. Many theoretical models have tried to explain this influence, with one of the most thoroughly researched being self-determination theory (SDT). We used a Delphi method to create a classification of teacher behaviors consistent with SDT. This is useful because SDT-based interventions have been widely used to improve educational outcomes. However, these interventions contain many components. Reliably classifying and labeling those components is essential for implementation, reproducibility, and evidence synthesis. We used an international expert panel (N = 34) to develop this classification system. We started by identifying behaviors from existing literature, then refined labels, descriptions, and examples using the Delphi panel’s input. Next, the panel of experts iteratively rated the relevance of each behavior to SDT, the psychological need that each behavior influenced, and its likely effect on motivation. To create a mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive list of behaviors, experts nominated overlapping behaviors that were redundant, and suggested new ones missing from the classification. After three rounds, the expert panel agreed upon 57 teacher motivational behaviors (TMBs) that were consistent with SDT. For most behaviors (77%), experts reached consensus on both the most relevant psychological need and influence on motivation. Our classification system provides a comprehensive list of TMBs and consistent terminology in how those behaviors are labeled. Researchers and practitioners designing interventions could use these behaviors to design interventions, to reproduce interventions, to assess whether these behaviors moderate intervention effects, and could focus new research on areas where experts disagreed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)
Type: Peer Reviewed Journal Article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10296
ISSN: 0022-0663
1939-2176
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000783
Appears in Collections:Counselling and Psychology - Publication

Show full item record

Page view(s)

13
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Sep 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.