Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10260
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBooranakittipinyo, Amphaien_US
dc.contributor.authorProf. LI Yi Man, Ritaen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhakdeephirot, Nutteeraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-15T07:42:43Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-15T07:42:43Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Air Transport Management, July 2024, vol. 118, article no. 102600.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0969-6997-
dc.identifier.issn1873-2089-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/10260-
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates travelers' perceptions of smart airport facilities through sentiment analysis. It collected 39,616 comments from thirteen smart airports, and 25,572 tweets were analyzed. Most mentioned words about the smart airport included "technology" and "security". Comments also highlighted concerns about airport customer service, including "bag," "transit," and "disabled." The results also reveal that travelers are more concerned about the outcome of these facilities, such as the efficiency and time management of flights via smart facilities. The most mentioned words in the tweets related to smart airport operations are "flight," "waiting," and "time". Despite most smart facilities being equipped in the airports aiming to raise travelers' satisfaction, the results showed that 12 smart airports' tweets were generally neutral. Smart airport facilities might not add as much value to the airport impression as we expect. Brisbane International Airport was the only one with a positive perception of smart airport facilities. Most travelers mentioned that the airport had faster and better wifi and the airport is continuously improving. In contrast, Charles de Gaulle Airport and London Heathrow Airport had the highest percentage of negative sentiment, with 25.90% and 27.52% of tweets being negative, respectively. Travelers' complained that self-check-in kiosks were a mess, unhelpful staff and poor wifi. The results reveal travelers' concerns regarding smart airport facilities, and they let us know the importance of smart facility management. Smart airport facilities were initially designed to shorten travelers' time and enhance satisfaction, yet unhelpful staff and poor managed kiosks raise dissatisfaction. This study helps airport managers and operators to address the weakest part of smart airports as reflected in social media comments. It also fills the academic voids in examining travelers' satisfaction with smart facilities using social media and sentiment analysis via artificial intelligence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Air Transport Managementen_US
dc.titleTravelers' perception of smart airport facilities: An X (Twitter) sentiment analysisen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102600-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Economics and Finance-
Appears in Collections:Economics and Finance - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Sep 15, 2024

Page view(s)

164
Last Week
11
Last month
checked on Sep 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.