陳健榮博士李晨萱2026-06-262026-06-262026中國語文通訊, 2026年, 第105卷, 第2期, 第395-420頁.1726-9245http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/27764Open access<jats:p>實詞如何透過語法化獲得並列連詞功能，是語言類型學一直關注的課題，近年亦有不少學者從跨語言比較的視角，探討並列連詞語法化的共性。本研究基於2010至2025年間的田野調查，收集了分屬426種語言及367種漢語方言的1533個並列連詞，旨在分析絲綢之路沿線語言並列連詞的語法特徵與語法化路徑。本文有兩點發現。第一，絲路語言的並列連詞語法化路徑可分為“共同施事型”與“共同受事型”：循“共同施事型”路徑語法化的伴隨標記，傾向於連接有生名詞;循“共同受事型”路徑語法化的伴隨標記，傾向於連接無生名詞。第二，絲路語言的並列連詞多與數詞同形，據此可分為“以一為和”及“以二為和”兩型。前者與數詞“一”同形，例如格魯吉亞語的-dan ertad、維吾爾語的bilan等;後者與數詞“二”同形，例如甘肅及青海地區東鄉語的guala以及部分甘青地區漢語方言中的“倆”、“兩個”等。本研究揭示絲路沿線語言連詞的多樣性，為語言類型學研究提供寶貴資料與新的啟示。</jats:p> The issue of how lexical words become coordinating conjunctions through grammaticalization has always interested scholars in linguistic typology, and, in recent years, many have examined the universal patterns of conjunction grammaticalization using cross-linguistic comparisons. This study is based on fieldwork from 2010 to 2025 and covers 1,533 coordinating conjunctions drawn from 426 languages and 367 Chinese dialects along the Silk Road, aiming to analyze their grammatical features and grammaticalization pathways. Two main findings are reported. (1) The grammaticalization pathways of coordinating conjunctions in Silk Road languages can be divided into “co-agent type” – which tends to link animate nouns – and “co-patient type” – which tends to combine inanimate nouns. (2) Many conjunctions in these languages are homophonous with numerals, leading to two subtypes: one where “and” corresponds to the numeral “one” (such as Georgian -dan ertad, Uyghur bilan), and the other where “and” aligns with the numeral “two” (such as Dongxiang guala in Gansu and Qinghai, and lia, liangge in some Mandarin dialects of the area). This research demonstrates the diversity of conjunctions in Silk Road languages, supplying important data and fresh insight for typological studies.zh並列連詞共同施事共同受事類型學語法化Coordinating ConjunctionCo-AgentCo-PatientTypologyGrammaticalizationPeer Reviewed Journal Article10.65961/crcl-2026-0020