黃啟深博士2026-09-022026-09-022026惠州學院學報, 2026年, 第46卷, 第1期, 第50-57 & 77頁.1671-5934http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/28825梁鼎芬以詩作聞名,至於他對傳統經史學的討論,過去則較少學者措意.梁氏雖無經學專著,但對經籍書注不乏議論.另外,梁氏曾執掌多所書院,從其製訂學規,搜羅圖書,編纂教材諸事宜,實又可窺其經典教育理念之一端.梁鼎芬長年襄贊張之洞興辦學堂,對晚清教育事業影響頗巨,研究其經學宗尚以及對經學教育的主張,除可為梁鼎芬其人研究補苴罅漏,亦可藉此考察晚清時期,中西學術消長之際,此消彼長之際問如何審視傳統學人.文章檢視梁氏奏摺,信札,詩文等資料,剖析他對學習經典,經學考據以至漢宋之爭的取態,冀可揭示梁氏於詩詞創作以外,其學術思想的另一面向.<br> Abstract:Liang Dingfen has long been recognized for his contributions to poetry,yet his engagement with the Confucian classics has received relatively little scholarly attention. Although he did not produce monographs on the Confucian canon，he offered extensive critiques of classical texts and their commentaries. Moreover，as an administrator of several academies,Liang played a crucial role in establishing academic regulations,curating book collections,and compiling teaching materials,all of which reflect key aspects of his educational philosophy on classical studies. He was a long-standing supporter of Zhang Zhidong's educational reforms and exerted a significant influence on education in the late Qing Dynasty. Examining his views on Confucian scholarship and classical learning not only addresses gaps in research on Liang himself but also illuminates how intellectuals in the late Qing Dynasty perceived traditional scholarship and sought to assert its authority amid the evolving dynamics between Chinese and Western learning. This paper analyzes Liang's memorials,letters,and literary works to explore his thoughts on classical studies,his stance on textual criticism,and factional debates such as the controversy over Han Leaning versus Song Learning，thereby uncovering a lesser-known aspect of his intellectual thought beyond his literary achievements.zh-CN梁鼎芬經學考據學漢宋之爭晚清教育Liang DingfenClassical StudiesTextologyThe Han Learning Ang Song Learning ControversyEducation In The late Qing DynastyPeer Reviewed Journal Article