Dr. LO Ka-wing, SallySallyDr. LO Ka-wingTanaka, HiromiHiromiTanakaPak, Chui ManChui ManPakTsui, Ming SumMing SumTsui2025-11-042025-11-042025The Journal of Adult Protection, 2025, vol. 27(3), pp. 165-177.1466-82032042-8669http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/25977<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper aims to examine the development of carer policies and protections in Hong Kong, emphasising the need to incorporate international practices in adult protection. It provides a substantial review of related legislations and official definitions regarding informal carers, outlining their roles and protections.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper reviews the current legal landscape and policies for informal carers in Hong Kong, discussing problems and complexities associated with the lack of legal definitions and protection for informal carers. The analysis includes relevant legislation from Hong Kong, documenting recent mechanisms and procedures initiated for the development of carer policies. This approach offers a more comprehensive overview of the discussions surrounding these issues.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>While recent initiatives in Hong Kong present valuable opportunities for policy development, the existing legal framework inadequately safeguards informal carers. The analysis identifies strengths and limitations of existing legislations and highlights significant gaps that require attention. It proposes that establishing a legal definition of carers is crucial for enhancing overall protection.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The research did not include interviews with policymakers, legislators, social workers or health-care professionals, potentially leading to a narrower but focused understanding of the consensus surrounding the role and identity of carers. Therefore, reviews of legislations and services are included to strengthen this angle of view.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The outcomes serve as a reference for helping professionals, policy advocates and policymakers, providing insights into the complexities of caregiving policies and enhancing protections for informal carers.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Social implications</jats:title> <jats:p>By addressing gaps in protection for informal carers, this paper can influence public attitudes toward caregiving and advocate for stronger legal safeguards, contributing to improved quality of life for both carers and care recipients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>This paper offers timely insights into carer policies in Hong Kong, benefiting stakeholders engaged in caregiving policy development and serving as a case study for other jurisdictions.</jats:p> </jats:sec>enCarersInformal CarersCarer IdentityCarer SupportCaregivingPeer Reviewed Journal Article10.1108/JAP-09-2024-0055