陳允鋒教授2022-04-092022-04-092002南開學報, 2002, 第5期, 頁92-97.1001-4667http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/7008韓愈雖然沒有完整意義上的關於天命問題的系統理論,但他著重從"天人相仇"的角度充分說明了人類怨天情緒產生的現實根源,為文人詩家抒寫因人生坎坷而引發的憤懣之思提供了獨特的理論依據.受此影響,韓癒的不少詩歌作品在抒發感激怨懟之氣的同時,往往訴及上天m從而強化了其作品的情感力量和批評是非顛倒的社會現實的力度m並且深刻地影響韓愈詩學美學思想的形成m改變其觀察社會審視自然的眼光和心態,改變了歷來詩家重視刻畫自然之美的創作傳統.<br> We are hardly to recognize that Han Yu bore the holism of destiny.Yet he had often applied the view that nature is at enmity with man to interpret how and why that man is so changeable in his feeling and thought;the feeling of groaning,sighing and cursing fate from which,he thought,men of letter and poets drawn their inspiration.We find in Han Yu’s poems that he gives expression the feeling of resentment and conveys to Heaven hisappeal,simultaneously.This would strengthen the power of moving feelings and make greater intensity of crit-icism which he was in the attempt to voice in his works.We are hardly to recognize that Han Yu bore no idea ofpredestination.It was this outlook with which Han Yu looked at the world,social and physical,before him,and,especially,the picture of nature he depicted is different to that of the predecessors who valued up on portraying the beauty of nature.zh-CN“天人相仇”憤懣之思詩學思想“Nature Is At Enmity with Man”Depressed and DiscontentedPoetics韓愈天命觀的文學意義及其對詩學思想的影響Of Han Yu’s Tianming Guan (attitude toward heaven’s will over man) : Literary implication and impact on poeticsPeer Reviewed Journal Article