Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4562
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDr. PENG Zhengmin, Kellyen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, Chi-Sumen_US
dc.contributor.authorShi, Junqien_US
dc.contributor.authorMao, Yinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-06T03:53:22Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-06T03:53:22Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 2011, vol. 28(2), pp. 379-399.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0217-4561-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11861/4562-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsia Pacific Journal of Managementen_US
dc.titleDifferences between odd number and even number response formats: Evidence from mainland Chinese respondentsen_US
dc.typePeer Reviewed Journal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10490-009-9143-6-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Business Administration-
Appears in Collections:Business Administration - Publication
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Page view(s)

125
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jan 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Impact Indices

Altmetric

PlumX

Metrics


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.